Search for: "J Arnold"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2014, 10:46 am
Fabio pictured while wonderingabout the implementation costsof the blocking order just issued against himFollowing last week's judgment in Cartier v BSkyB [here, a case concerning the possibility of requiring internet service providers (ISPs) to block, or at least impede, access by their subscribers to websites that advertise and sell counterfeit goods] this morning Arnold J returned to the more traditional ecosystem for blocking injunctions in the UK, ie… [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
"As a preliminary point Arnold J also addressed criticisms of the fair use doctrine as "indeterminate and unpredictable". [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:47 am
" (para 67)Yesterday Arnold J gave judgment in this saga (Nestlé v Cadbury [2016] EWHC 50 (Ch)), and dismissed Nestlé's appeal.WTF?!? [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
” Arnold J accepted that LTC’s trade marks looked different to normal cars and that they resembled a type of 1950s car. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 3:36 pm
On a very damp Monday night, the great and good of the London copyright scene, from the Bench to the IPO and from the Bar to University Chairs (and some, like this blogger, tipped off to the existence of the event by our sister IPKat blog) crammed a lecture theatre somewhere between Smithfield and the Barbican to hear Mr Justice Arnold deliver the 2014 Herchel Smith lecture. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:55 am
Arnold J gets appellate...Tuesday 26 April 2016 was World Intellectual Property Day. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:30 am
Last year the High Court of England and Wales (Arnold J) in FAPL v BT [2017] EWHC 480 Ch concluded that it had jurisdiction under section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act to order to block access to streaming services (rather than the more tradition case of websites) giving unauthorised access to protected content. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 6:45 am
However, Arnold J suggested that it might be helpful if the CJEU was to alert national courts if this was indeed the intention. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
There were four meaty issues for Arnold J to tackle. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:19 am
On 21 December 2017, the last day of the English High Court term, Arnold J issued a short judgment in the case of Union Des Associations Européennes de Football (better known as UEFA) v BT and Os [2017] EWHC 3414 (Ch), available on Bailii here. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:10 am
Arnold: A Legacy of Justice on the Federal Bench (2009) is a new book by Polly J. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:20 am
At first instance before Arnold J, both sides claimed that the construction adopted by the Landgericht Mannheim (Mannheim Regional Court) supported their case, although Arnold J considered that the German construction was more consistent with Microsoft's interpretation than with Motorola's. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 10:00 am
Arnold (Goodmans, Toronto) have published What Can Trade Teach Tax? [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:24 am
Roberta Arnold & Noëlle Quénivet have published International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law Towards a New Merger in International Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2008). [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
Unfortunately for them, Arnold J found that the research did not separate the results into the relevant class, that the sector was dominated by a small number of vehicle rental companies and that, until Europcar adopted the e-moving logo, Enterprise was the only company in the sector which used a lower case 'e' logo on a green background.The SurveysArnold J then introduced the surveys. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:47 am
However, the Arnold J nonetheless felt it necessarily to submit a reference to the CJEU on the question of the third party market authorization. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
Arnold J ordered an expedited trial for early June 2016. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:12 pm
A possibly different Arnold, and a cat wielding lightsabers, yesterday. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:00 am
Arnold, terrific take on the judicial nominations process. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 10:37 am
Before opening the decision, the AmeriKat thought that she would be in for the trade mark detailed, fully-explained decision that makes Arnold J's decisions excellent reading. [read post]
